Does Israel Need A Kick In The Rear?
The question for today - (or this week, month, what have you...) Does Israel need a kick in the rear?
My answer? Yes, it does.
Now, I'm sure it sucks to be a country that all of your neighbours would usually like to see wiped out and to have armed rebels and terrorists almost constantly attacking you. And, yes, Israel does have a right to defend itself. But in defending itself it should not do those same things for which it condemns Hezbollah and Hamas - namely, the killing of civilians who have no part in the conflict.
Israel in Lebanon acts a little like the U.S. in Iraq. It bombs locations on the advice of incomplete intelligence information and hopes that the dead turn out to be bad guys.
Now, I suppose we have to be thankful that Israel's assualt on a United Nations observation post was inadvertent. Had it been intentional, there should be the strongest of sanctions if not armed response against Israel. But, even if an accident, it should still be regarded as criminal. That observation post likely hasn't moved in three decades. Israel had to know that it was there and could have acted in such a way as to prevent the loss of innocent life. But this owuld have meant using ground forces, which are a little more vulnerable than tactical aircraft.
So far in the conflict, Hezbollah has killed roughly 50 Israeli civilians. Israel has killed several hundred Lebanese citizens, 8 Canadians and other foreign nationals. And Israel wants to claim that right is on their side?
Israel has stated they want to create a buffer between themselves and Hezbollah. They have said this should be around 2 kilometers wide. Okay, why does this need to be in Lebanon. Israel could create a 2km buffer inside their own territory, no invasion of a sovereign nation is needed, and they could be free to bomb the buffer zone as they please. But, apparently, it's more fun to wreak havoc once again on the Middle East's favourite whipping-boy.
My answer? Yes, it does.
Now, I'm sure it sucks to be a country that all of your neighbours would usually like to see wiped out and to have armed rebels and terrorists almost constantly attacking you. And, yes, Israel does have a right to defend itself. But in defending itself it should not do those same things for which it condemns Hezbollah and Hamas - namely, the killing of civilians who have no part in the conflict.
Israel in Lebanon acts a little like the U.S. in Iraq. It bombs locations on the advice of incomplete intelligence information and hopes that the dead turn out to be bad guys.
Now, I suppose we have to be thankful that Israel's assualt on a United Nations observation post was inadvertent. Had it been intentional, there should be the strongest of sanctions if not armed response against Israel. But, even if an accident, it should still be regarded as criminal. That observation post likely hasn't moved in three decades. Israel had to know that it was there and could have acted in such a way as to prevent the loss of innocent life. But this owuld have meant using ground forces, which are a little more vulnerable than tactical aircraft.
So far in the conflict, Hezbollah has killed roughly 50 Israeli civilians. Israel has killed several hundred Lebanese citizens, 8 Canadians and other foreign nationals. And Israel wants to claim that right is on their side?
Israel has stated they want to create a buffer between themselves and Hezbollah. They have said this should be around 2 kilometers wide. Okay, why does this need to be in Lebanon. Israel could create a 2km buffer inside their own territory, no invasion of a sovereign nation is needed, and they could be free to bomb the buffer zone as they please. But, apparently, it's more fun to wreak havoc once again on the Middle East's favourite whipping-boy.